Leaders of the pro-public school organization called Public Schools First in North Carolina discovered that many public school parents and advocates are unaware that the state’s General Assembly has passed a budget that gives vouchers to the rich. They are distributing the following opinion piece from the Greensboro News to inform the public:
Our Opinion: Five words for GOP candidates: ‘And you’re OK with That?’
“And you’re OK with that?”
As Republican candidates for the state legislature begin to the make the rounds this fall, they should be hearing those five words over and over from constituents of all political stripes.
At every stop, on every stump, they should be pressed to give straight answers to that simple question on three issues:
Private-school vouchers
Even as they’ve increased taxpayer funding for private school tuition, adding wealthy families to the dole, many local public districts, including our own in Guilford and Forsyth counties, complain that they are seriously underfunded.
To be more specific, your party plans to plow hundreds of additional millions in taxpayer money into private school tuition assistance. Although 40% of that money ($96 million) would go to middle-class and working-class families earning between $57,721 to $115,440 a year (for a family of four), 44% (or $107 million) would go families earning $115,441 to $259,740.
And 16% (or $39 million) would go to those who need it the very least: wealthy families earning more than $259,741 annually.
One Democratic lawmaker likened it to asking low- and moderate-income taxpayers to help pay for a wealthy kid’s Porsche.
How do you square that with your rhetoric against “the welfare state” and profligate spending of other people’s money?
How do you square it with public school funding gaps throughout the state?
And how do you tell public schools no, that’s all we have to spend and then turn around and tell rich families y’all come. Who do we make the check out to?
Keeping secrets
Your party also slipped a provision into the state budget bill last fall that allows state lawmakers to decide for themselves whether they will make any of their documents accessible to the public.
By law, they also get to choose whether to destroy or sell documents. They’re the decider. Which means they’re creating their own deep state right here and now on Tobacco Road.
What are they trying to hide and why?
And what gives them the right to membership in this exclusive club, but not others (the governor, the lieutenant governor, the attorney general and other North Carolina officials who are elected statewide need not apply)?
Easy money
Then there’s the provision the Republican-controlled legislature embedded within an (unnecessary) anti-masking bill that allows more “dark money” donations to political candidates in North Carolina.
As the current law stands, candidates must disclose the names of donors to their campaigns. They also are prohibited from taking donations from corporations, and contributions from individuals and political groups may not exceed $6,400.
This bill would change all that by making it legal for political parties in the state to take money from “Super PACs,” which are allowed to keep their donors secret and may receive unlimited amounts of money.
Those Super PACs would be able to collect the money and pass it on to the political parties, which could then funnel it to candidates, no questions asked.
At least your party has made no secret of the fact that it designed this new rule specifically with the GOP gubernatorial candidate in mind. Mark Robinson substantially trails his Democratic opponent, Josh Stein, in fundraising.
To recap, are you OK with:
Channeling taxpayer money to rich people as public schools go wanting?
Keeping documents and correspondence a secret from the public … unless you decide to share it?
And allowing anonymous cash to flow unfettered to candidates of both parties?
If the answer is yes, please explain how any of this benefits most North Carolinians and why we should vote for you anyway.
And how this in any way resembles government for, by and of the people.